Position:
Full-time lawyer
Education:
Graduated from the Guangdong Ocean University (now Guangdong Ocean University) Law Program in July 2005 with a LL.B.
Professional Qualifications：
In 2007 he passed the National Lawyers’ Qualification Test and gained the Lawyers’ Qualification Certificate;
In January 2018, he obtained the Qualification Certificate of Labor and personnel dispute arbitrator;
In December 2019, he obtained the certificate of Labour Personnel Mediator;
Experience：
Served in Guangzhou Intermediate People's Court from October 2005 to August 2008;
From August 2008 to October 2009 in Guangzhou Sanxin Holding Group Co. , Ltd. as legal counsel;
From October 2009 to July 2019, he was chief lawyer of Samsung Electronics (as a lawyer of Yang & Lin Co. Law Frim) ;
Since April 2014, he has been a lawyer and deputy director of Yang & Lin Co. Law Firm.
Yuan Zhutian has the ability to grasp the legal issues of civil and commercial affairs from both court and enterprise perspectives. He has rich experience in contract review and is familiar with dealing with trade contract disputes and labor disputes. Good at handling labor disputes, real estate disputes, the company's perennial legal counsel and other aspects of the dispute.
Typical cases：
In 2013, as a result of the revision of the Labour Contract Law of the People's Republic of China, the proportion of employees dispatched for work should not exceed 10% of the total number of employees. A Fortune 500 company needed to work with a labor service company on the basis of outsourcing, but a large number of the original outsourcing labors refused to change their contracts, and disrupted the normal operation of the company by pulling banners, sit-ins, etc. , resulting in a standstill in the visa exchange process. Finally, through introducing the Labor Department to intervene in mediation, negotiations and the termination of the contract, labor arbitration and other ways to resolve the conflict. That not only saved the company's goodwill, but also saved a lot of costs.
In 2016, a factory failed in a flagship product quality dispute case because it did not pay enough attention to first instance, the second trial began with a thorough understanding of the working principles of communication base stations, the operators' access principles for mobile terminal equipment, and the horizontal comparison of the card-free access network functions of other similar products on the market, he won in the second trial judge's final judgment, for a Fortune 500 companies to recover huge economic interests.